Sunday, May 22, 2016

Fundamental Enzyme Kinetics part 2: Kinetic Parameters

And now it's time to go back into the labs of the Relationships Institute of EnzymeLand!

I promised you pretty graphs in the last post, and now you get your pretty graphs! Here's the first one, which if I remember correctly is called the Michaelis-Menten graph:

Here we have the rate of reaction (v) on the y-axis and the substrate concentration [S] on the x-axis. Vmax is the maximum rate of reaction. As you can see, Vmax isn't represented anywhere on that red line at all. Instead, it is asymptotic to that line (i.e. approaches but never touches). This is because you technically need infinite substrate concentrations to reach Vmax, which isn't really very practical. Vmax/2 and subsequently Km can also be approximated from this graph (I say "approximated" because it can be very hard to tell where the Vmax asymptote is). Note that Km is a substrate concentration and not a rate.

As I've just alluded to, it can be hard to work out where that Vmax asymptote is on a curvy graph like that. Also, curvy graphs are harder to work with than linear graphs. That's why the Lineweaver-Burk plot was invented. The Lineweaver-Burk plot plots the reciprocal of v against the reciprocal of [S].



The equation for this line is essentially just the Michaelis-Menten equation turned upside down (i.e. the reciprocal of the Michaelis-Menten equation). I can't be bothered showing you the rearranging step-by-step, so here's the end product:

1/v = 1/Vmax + (Km/Vmax)(1/[S])

Anyway, from this equation and the basic rules of working with linear equations, (Km/Vmax) is the slope of the curve and 1/Vmax is the y-intercept. The x-intercept is equal to -(1/Km).

Although reciprocals might seem a bit fiddly to work with, the fact is that the Lineweaver-Burk plot is actually easier to obtain estimates of Vmax and Km from. You see, the Michaelis-Menten plot requires that you figure out where the asymptote is, which isn't always easy. Meanwhile, here 1/Vmax is bang smack on the y-axis. You do have to do some simple rearranging to find out what Vmax is from there, but it's a helluva lot easier to do that than guess at an asymptote.

Now for some other cool tricks that you can use with these enzyme parameters!

Turnover Number

Firstly, let's play around with kcat and Vmax. From the previous post, Vmax = kcat[E]total. This can be rearranged to give you kcat = Vmax/[E]total. kcat, a.k.a. the rate constant of the [ES] -> E + P reaction, can also be called the "Turnover Number." It gives a guide as to how many substrates can be transformed into products in a unit of time (usually seconds, so normally turnover number is given by s-1).

Affinity and Catalytic Efficiency

Now let's play around with Km! From my previous post, Km = (k-1 + kcat)/k1. Now let's have a look at what happens if kcat is substantially larger or smaller than the other values!

If kcat is much smaller than k-1, then Km ~ k-1/k1. Incidentally, k-1/k1 is also equal to the dissociation constant for [ES] (since it is the rate constant for the dissociation of ES into E and S, divided by the rate constant of the association of E and S to form ES). Hence, when kcat is much smaller than k-1, Km can also be seen as a measure of the affinity of an enzyme for its substrate. The lower the dissociation constant (and hence the Km), the greater the affinity that the enzyme has for its substrate. (Awwww. Get that Km low enough, and I bet they'll be giving each other roses on a daily basis.)

If kcat is much larger than k-1, then Km ~ kcat/k1. This can be rearranged to give k1 ~ kcat/Km. That might not mean much to you now, so let's look at another equation first. In particular, I want to take you back to the Michaelis-Menten Equation, which was this:

v = (Vmax[S])/(Km + [S])

Now, remember how Vmax = kcat[E]total? Substitute that in:

v = ( kcat[E]total[S])/(Km + [S])

Now, when [S] is much smaller than Km, the denominator becomes pretty much equal to Km so that you get this:

v = (kcat/Km)[E]total[S]

Now, remember how rate constants are the concentrations of the reactants multiplied by a rate constant? Well, here we have two reactants, [E] and [S], so (kcat/Km) essentially becomes the rate constant of [E] and [S] banging each other. (What? I meant that the enzyme and substrate are colliding with each other! What did you think I meant?!)

Anyway, since (kcat/Km) is the rate constant here, it's also a measure of catalytic efficiency, which to my understanding is how well the enzyme transforms a substrate into a product.

Now, back to k1 ~ kcat/Km. This equation almost seems to suggest that when kcat is much larger than k-1, the catalytic efficiency is roughly equal to the rate constant of E and S getting together to form ES. From the lecture slides, it says that the significance of this is that the catalytic efficiency can be no higher than the rate of diffusion controlled binding of E to S, which makes sense: product can't be formed if the substrate and enzyme aren't already an item, so to speak.

Alright, that's enough equations for this post. The next post is going to include betrayal! Competition! Steamy bed action! You won't want to miss it!

No comments:

Post a Comment